International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences. 23/Oct/2025;38:e20240246.

Left Versus Right Radial Access in Elderly Patients for Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Anna Loise da Cruz Gonçalves , Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante, Brenda de Adonai Rodrigues Martins, Caroline de Oliveira Fischer Bacca , Júlia Gonçalves Gadelha , Suelen Queiroz, Gabriel Erzinger , Octávio Drummond Guina

DOI: 10.36660/ijcs.20240246

Abstract

Background:

Radial artery access is widely used in coronary procedures, but the optimal choice between left (LRA) and right (RRA) radial access remains controversial, especially in older patients.

Objective:

Compare LRA and RRA in patients ≥ 70 years undergoing coronary procedures.

Methods:

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs), adopting a significance level of 5% for all statistical analyses. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies comparing LRA and RRA in patients aged ≥ 70 years. The main outcomes were fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and procedure difficulty.

Results:

We included 1,094 patients from 4 studies, of which 3 were RCTs. Among them, 821 (75%) patients underwent the procedure via RRA. The LRA group showed a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (standard mean difference [MD]: −0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.67 to −0.42; p < 0.01; I² = 80%), and there was a significant reduction in the contrast volume between the groups, favoring LRA (MD: −13.04 milliliters; 95% CI: −18.0 to −8.20; p < 0.01; I² = 0%). However, there was no significant difference in the perceived difficulty level between the groups (risk ratio [RR]: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.73; p = 0.92; I² = 0%).

Conclusion:

LRA is associated with a significantly shorter fluoroscopy time, suggesting a greater efficiency in terms of radiation exposure. These findings imply that, while LRA may offer some efficiency benefits, the choice between LRA and RRA should consider other clinical and technical factors, such as operator preference and experience.